AI × functional brain imaging


We study fMRI images with AI to understand how brain networks work together—and what changes in mental illness.

From scan to insight
Functional brain imagingImages → patterns → networks
From scan to insight
Published motor-contrast mapNeuroVault / 10426

NeuroAI / Functional image research

Read the image.
Understand the system.

AI image recognition.
Brain networks in context.

Open research image
NeuroVault 10426Left ↔ right motor
3D slice stack
axialz = 37 mm
Published left-versus-right motor fMRI contrast over a standard anatomical template
fMRI contrast · anatomical background
Positive contrastNegative contrastSpatial review · not a live acquisition

01 / Research approach

A volume, slice by slice.

Read functional images in their spatial context. Quality and alignment come first.

3DSpatial image3 mmVoxel spacing

This published motor contrast shows the image layer. Our research extends to 4D fMRI: space plus time.

Image review / spatial quality control

Published fMRI contrast + reference anatomy. The animation shows image review, not AI inference or a diagnostic result.

View the original image

Our direction

AI is the method.
Psychiatric evidence is the goal.

01 / Research

One aim.
Three routes.

Treatment / Current direction

Link fMRI patterns to treatment response.

Can brain signals add to clinical evidence?
Image patternsClinical outcomesExternal validation

02 / Open evidence

Small circuits.
Bigger questions.

Research lens / MaleCNS

A nervous system,
cell by cell.

Google Research and collaborators mapped the male fruit fly’s brain and ventral nerve cord: more than 166,000 neurons and 125 million synaptic connections. AI traces cells from electron-microscope images; experts review the reconstructed anatomy.

We reanalyse the released annotations and neuron geometry below, then set out how network-based thinking can inform our psychiatric research.

Google Research · 03 Sep 2026Original study / Cell
01Electron microscopyImage the tissue
02AI segmentationTrace neuronal shapes
03Expert proofreadingReview the reconstruction
04ConnectomeAnalyse the wiring

The Google article describes flood-filling convolutional networks that iteratively extend a cell segmentation through 3D image space. Human proofreading remains essential. Our analysis begins with the released tables and skeletons, after reconstruction.

Public-data analysis / MaleCNS v1.0

165,122 neurons in this analysis

Filtered to status = Traced
Recomputed 05 Sep 2026

Where the neurons belong

Released superclass annotations · complete filtered cohort

  1. Optic-lobe intrinsic89,39054.1%
  2. Central-brain intrinsic32,16019.5%
  3. Ventral-cord intrinsic13,1518.0%
  4. Visual projection9,2015.6%
  5. Ventral-cord sensory6,3653.9%
  6. Central-brain sensory4,8682.9%
  7. Other annotated classes9,4715.7%
  8. Unassigned5160.3%

Denominator: 165,122 neurons with status = Traced. Bars share a fixed 0–100% scale; counts are neurons, not synapses.

Data: FlyEM (HHMI Janelia), University of Cambridge, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Google Research. CC BY 4.0. Aggregation and centreline-display adaptation: NeuroAI. Dataset & release files.

What the original study adds

Local differences.
Network-wide questions.

The research team reports 262 sex-specific and 114 sexually dimorphic cell types. Many differences sit in higher-order centres, illustrating why circuitry matters beyond a simple neuron count.

For NeuroAI, the methodological lesson is to examine network organisation alongside individual features—not to equate fly circuits with human psychiatric diagnoses.

Janelia / published findings

NeuroAI / proposed study

Functional images.
Clinical questions.

Can AI recognise patterns in 4D fMRI that help explain treatment response and symptom change?

This is the human fMRI study design we want to test. The results above describe a fly dataset; they do not demonstrate a psychiatric biomarker or treatment benefit.

Discuss the research question
Structural connectomicsNeuron → neuron

EM reconstruction measures anatomical synaptic wiring.

Functional connectivityRegion ↔ region

fMRI estimates statistical relationships between regional BOLD signals.

01

Clinical first

Begin with a psychiatric question, not an algorithm.

02

Longitudinal

Model change rather than a single snapshot.

03

Transportable

Test evidence beyond one site or dataset.

04

Accountable

Keep assumptions visible and challengeable.

Aerial view of Killian Court and the MIT campus
Cambridge, MassachusettsEmily Dahl / MIT

Research context

Technical ambition,
clinically examined.

Independent programme · Not an official MIT website

03 / People

Six perspectives.
One programme.

MIT × Google · 2022–2025

Tomohisa Sasaki

Brain imaging AI research

Participated in a joint MIT–Google research project developing AI to quantify psychiatric states from brain-imaging data. Worked across image preprocessing and analysis, model implementation, performance and generalisation testing, and communication of findings.
Programme
MIT × Google joint research
Period
Jun 2022 – Feb 2025
Domain
AI for psychiatric imaging
Brain-image preprocessingAI model implementationPerformance validationGeneralisation testing

04 / Collaborate

Bring the question.
Build the evidence.

Selected context

Google Research / MaleCNS MaleCNS / Open data Functional connectomes / Nilearn Digital phenotyping Mental-health crisis prediction AI in neuropsychopharmacology Practical AI in psychiatry